Newsletter
MENU

GISPRI No. 14, 1996

Study Group Reports

China in Transition
and its Outlook for the Future

Satoshi Amako
Professor, Faculty of International Politics and Economy,
Aoyama Gakuin University


Introduction

The outlook for China, post-Deng Xiaoping, has been widely discussed around the world including Japan, the United States and Hong Kong. Why does China attract this much attention? China made a major turnabout at the end of 1978 to follow a line of modernization.

From that time on, China has made active efforts to improve its relationship and deepen mutual dependency with the international community, resulting in the worldwide perception that China is a nation with enormous economic potential. Some are even forecasting that the economy of Greater China, including Hong Kong and Taiwan, will be the largest in the world by the turn of the century, surpassing even that of the United States.

Watching the collapse the socialist regimes in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe and despite the end of the cold war, China has consistently modernized its military and increased its armaments since the late 1980s. Coupled with its independent foreign policies pursued from earlier days, China is gaining huge power without yielding to the wishes of the United States in terms of international politics and security.

The recent hard Chinese stance toward territorial disputes in the South China Sea, tensions in the bilateral relationship between China and the United States, and repeated nuclear tests contribute to the development of the presence of China as a potential threat to the international community. At the same time, pressure exerted upon the world by the sheer size of China's population, which has reached 1.2 billion and is still growing by 15 million every year, may not be taken lightly from socioeconomic as well as political perspectives.

A number of questions arise. To name but a few: How far will China expand in the next century with its aim of becoming a "rich and powerful nation?" Will it really surpass the United States and become the world's greatest economic super power? To what extent is the theory of a Chinese threat real? Or in contrast with this swelling power, will the Communist Party's autocratic regime continue, or will there be major political turmoil in the post-Deng Xiaoping period? Might the Hong Kong and Taiwan questions cause instability in the international community? Will economic reforms really succeed in view of serious strains on the Chinese social fabric already apparent in various ways?

In examining the present and future of China, it will not suffice to speculate on the issue by merely piecing together superficial phenomena on the political, economic and social arenas, particularly the power struggle among the central leadership, economic problems, and official economic and foreign policies. Correct understanding of China probably involves analysis within a certain framework of references as an indispensable approach. This framework must take into account cultural aspects and diverse social structures formed by vast geographic expansion and long history. Without such an approach, this country will not disclose its overall picture. Since exact presentation of such a framework is beyond the scope of this paper(1), the author will simply identify structural perspectives for examining modern China.

1. Five key considerations for understanding the present condition.

First, it is necessary to identify fundamental characteristics peculiar to China formed by long history extending several thousand years, and within geographic and natural restrictions, and thereby will not easily undergo any transformation. This paper first identifies them as "three vastnesses" and secondly as geographic diversities. "Three vastnesses" consist of (i) vast size of population far exceeding the world's average, (ii) vast size of land areas reaching close to 9.6 million square kilometers, which is the third largest in the world and comparable with that of all of Europe, and (iii) spiritual vastness as represented in Chinese thought such as "respect for unity?" and the Chinese perception of order with a concentric expanse under authoritarian hierarchy.

The three vastnesses exert strong influence and impose restrictions on diverse phenomena and efforts in China. For example, the vast size of its population creates constraints as seen in the adoption of the "one-child" policy, and the need to promote economic reforms while securing an enormous food supply and number of jobs. Vast land areas require colossal administrative machinery and ideology to reign over them. The discipline of traditional Chinese thought seems to exert a certain degree of influence upon its foreign policy stance.

The second consideration, or geographical diversities, includes diversity of nature (i.e., topography ranging from the subarctic zone to tropics, marshland to desert, and mountains to plains), multiracial constitution and that of customs of life. Aside from these underlying diversities, social, economic and cultural differences such as cities vs. countryside, coastal vs. interior provinces, and elites vs. the masses have significant meanings. Reigning over such diversities from the bottom of the social scale to the periphery of the territory to run effective government has not been easy despite the existence of powerful leaders such as Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping, and strong rule by one-party autocracy. Infiltration and thorough implementation of policy measures have also been difficult. China has never been as simple a political entity as can be painted in a single color. Geographic diversities have been the major factor behind these characteristics.

The third key consideration is the strength of the Communist Party rule which has maintained the central position in politics, economy and social life since the founding of the People's Republic of China. The Communist Party has a dominating presence.

Its total membership is about 55 million, representing roughly 4 percent of the national population. Chinese armed forces are the largest in the world, totaling over 3 million, and are basically the Communist Party's military. Mass organizations, including Communist Youth League and Federation of Women and Youth, support the party rule as its substructures.

As for political organizations other than the Communist Party, there are eight democratic factions including Chinese Democratic Federation and Revolutionary Commission of Chinese Nationalist Party, which are active on the National People's Congress and People's Congress on Political Cooperation and Commerce. Combined membership of these organizations totals less than one million. They openly acknowledge that they submit to the guidance of the Communist Party. They are a far cry from an opposing force to the Communist Party. Other non-communist party activities include the Democratic Wall movement in 1978, and the pro-democracy movement in Tiananmen Square in 1989, but participating organizations were subject to crackdown, and their leaders were either arrested or forced into exile. In other words, there is no organ that can replace the Communist Party and exercise sovereign power. This will not hold true if the army takes action to replace the party, but such a situation is unlikely at present.

As shown, the Communist Party enjoys a powerful presence, but this does not mean that there is no problem in the country's reign due more than anything else to signs of "instability" beginning to surface in the colossal organization of the Communist Party itself. Firstly, with the emphasis on economic activities and expansion of autonomy brought about by the pursuit of the reformist open-door policies, subordinate organizations have begun to go their own way, or lay aside party activities to concentrate on moneymaking. This has resulted in the malfunction of party organizations, and the reduction of the central government's ability to exercise control and ensure thorough implementation of its policies. As disengagement from ideology progresses, their ideological hold on the people has weakened. The famous phrase, "if the higher-ups have a policy, subordinates have a countermeasure," describes this situation well.

The second important instability concerns the legitimacy of the Communist Party. The pursuit of a reformist open-door line has divided the society into various classes, and has led to the diversification of interests and values among the people. As the proportion grows of younger generations who do not have first-hand knowledge of the communist revolution increases, more and more people no longer identify themselves with the Communist Party. Against this backdrop, experience and achievements of the revolution and liberalization struggle which formerly served as a priori proof of the legitimacy of the Communist Party rule are beginning to loose their absolute significance. Demand for the formulation of procedures to give a concrete form to democratic sovereignty has come out in the open. The Communist Party will be forced to create a new rationale and prop up the facade of orthodoxy to justify its leadership.

The third instability is social discontent. Pursuit of reformist open-door policies has generated many diverse benefits. The lack of the regulatory framework that would ensure equitable distribution of those benefits within the society, however, has led to the creation of a social structure characterized by privileges and corruption, allowing improper concentration of riches in the party's senior ranks and those with special connections to them. This in turn has triggered mounting social discontent, and there has been such strong criticism against the party rule that a report warned: "out of present China's social ills, corruption has been the focus of the greatest degree of the people's attention and discontent, and is most difficult to achieve any improvement(2)." As outlined above, understanding the Communist Party in the dimension of today's Chinese society requires observation from dual perspectives of its enormous presence and "instability".

As the fourth key consideration for understanding the present conditions, it is necessary to confirm the fundamental direction of China in the past and future; i.e., economic construction through modernization and reformist open-door line. Strong commitment to this line was expressed at the 14th National Party Congress: "Uphold for 100 years without deviation." Objectively speaking, this line may also be regarded as an irreversible tide for the following three reasons.

Firstly, the present theory of a socialist market economy is the product of more than a decade and some-odd years of theorization, and as such is backed by stores of well-developed theories. The theorization process began from the shift of emphasis from the continuation of revolution to economic construction and modernization at the third session of the 11th Party Congress in 1978. An open-door policy to foreign investment was adopted in 1979. A socialist merchandise economy was proposed in 1984. Then, in 1987, the theory of an elementary socialist development stage was introduced as a stage of overall historical development, justifying the need to let productive forces loose and develop a merchandise economy. Subsequently, a coastal development strategy was announced in 1988, and an omnibus open door strategy in 1991. Along these lines, establishment of a socialist market economy was identified as the objective.

Secondly, the progress of the modernization and reformist open-door policy was accompanied by structural social change. In rural communities, people's communes were dismantled, a contract responsibility system became widespread among rural households, and Township and Village Enterprises rapidly developed. These events created social strata, and caused migration and diversification of values among peasants. In cities, structural change in the economy took the form of the development of private enterprises and stores, entry of foreign-affiliated companies, and expansion of market mechanisms. Needless to say, the planned economy system still exists in basic industries, and not much progress has been achieved in streamlining state-run industries. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that these changes will be reversed.

Thirdly, pursuit of modernization and a reformist open-door line has more or less benefited the majority of the Chinese people, albeit disproportionately. The Dengist doctrine that some parts of the country may get rich before others, certainly created extremely prosperous regions and individuals, but the effects of economic reforms and open-door policy extended to the inland, rural and border areas. Economic levels are at least somewhat improved for these regions in general. It is not possible to expect these ascending trends to continue perpetually in the future, but at least disproportionate but overall improvement of economic levels may well continue for the time being. Based on such understanding, modernization and the reformist open-door line will likely be maintained as the basic direction.

Finally, provincial performance should be identified as the fifth key consideration for understanding the present conditions. This is a political and economic characteristic which gained prominence during the reformist era. Provinces originally had important roles to play in political and economic arenas(3), but acquired enormous power particularly as a result of the decentralization policy of the central government during the reformist era. Particularly marked as the contents of the decentralization was the relinquishing of legislative power (local legislation) and implementation of a local finance contract system.

As a result of these policies, local governments (mainly coastal provinces such as Guangdong, Fuchien, Chiangsu and Shantung) became prosperous, acquired many diverse vested interests, and resisted or even raised open objections to some of the central planners' policies and decisions. For example, the so-called "fief economy phenomena" took place around 1988. Provinces set up checkpoints at will and imposed restrictions on the exit and entry of raw materials to and from other provinces. At an operations meeting with provincial and municipal governors held before the 7th session of the 13th Party Congress in December 1990, the central government called for a bigger share of provincial corporate tax revenues to rectify chronic budget deficits and re-centralization of powers relinquished earlier. According to a report, local governments rebelled against this demand, and the central government finally felt obliged to make some concessions(4).

In 1992 the central government tried to put a halt to the local construction boom of "open" areas which had caused runaway inflation, but provinces disregarded the central policy and "open" areas mushroomed across the nation.

Relationships between the central and local governments, extent of performance achieved by local governments and relationships among local governments will become increasingly important as factors in analyzing the characteristics of administration, policy decisions, economic balance and changes in future China. Attention will have to be paid to the relationship between the central and local governments whether the future political system will turn, for example, to authoritarianism or democracy(5).

The five key factors identified above must be kept in mind whenever Chinese phenomena of today or the future are under consideration.

2. Short-term outlook: political movements before and in the post-Deng Xiaoping perio.

This section will attempt to provide an outlook of the political scene upon uncertain arrival of the post-Deng period under the assumption that it will be within a year or two from now. Judging from the major political and economic trends in the past, the following five points will likely be identifiable as important underlying factors.

  1. Continuance of a reformist open-door line:
    China will be forced to make strenuous efforts to cope with serious problems such as worsening inflation, income disparities and securing food supply for an ever-increasing population. It will have to find equilibrium between efforts in such areas and the pursuit of a reformist line.

  2. Improvement of overall economic performance:
    Economic performance in this section means fruits or achievements realized under a certain regime. According to Grossman's criteria, for example, it includes prosperity, growth, stability, efficiency, security, equality and/or fairness, economic freedom, economic independence and environmental protection.

  3. Acceleration of disengagement from ideology:
    Settlement of socialism vs. capitalism supremacy arguments among the central leadership. Insatiable pursuit of economic interests among high-ranking officials and the masses.

  4. Progress of political unrest and simultaneous increase of expectations and yearning for stability:
    This will be dealt with in more detail in the discussion of the subsequent issue. What must be emphasized at this point is that "despite growing instability" as characterized by rising crime rates and the decline in the Communist Party's ability to exercise control, loathing of political disruption will also be prevalent due to the experience of continued economic expansion, tragic history of the Cultural Revolution and witnessing of the collapse of the socialist regime in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe.

  5. Increasingly strong influence of international events to domestic politics.
    What are the noteworthy issues in the short-term outlook? The first such issue is the power struggle for the post of paramount leader. There are three alternatives.

    1) Lawful struggle: This will involve concrete cause such as obvious policy failure or mounting social instability. For example, Jiang Zemin's leadership will be questioned if the anti-corruption/graft campaign promoted at his initiative fails to bring any notable results. Unlike earlier days, ideological factors will not likely be the focus of the struggle. The Political Bureau (Politburo) and Central Committee will be the stage of the struggle, but provincial voices will be reflected in its outcome considering the enhanced status of local governments as outlined above. This will be principally a power struggle among the present top leaders including Jiang Zemin, Li Peng and Qiao Shi.

    2) Unlawful struggle: Looking back at Chinese history, there is a good chance of a court coup similar to the Lin Biao incident and downfall of the Gang of Four. Right or wrong of policies and lines will not be the primary cause. It will arise out of a factor which will not be easily brought to a legal channel such as blunt power struggle when it is brought to an end in a short time due to the concerned parties' intention to avoid nationwide political disruption. This will be a power struggle behind closed doors and involve submerged leaders such as Zhao Ziyang and Yang Shangkun who are deprived of power at present.

    3) Amicable coordination within leadership: Transition to and enhancement of collective leadership by dividing responsibilities will be highly likely if there is no radical antagonism on policies and lines and a strong will to avoid disintegration among leaders who fail to reach consensus on a single strong man upon whom absolute authority will be conferred. The author believes that the present central leadership pivoting on Jiang Zemin depends on Deng's authority for legitimacy, and regards it as "pseudo" collective leadership which is in the gradual process of eliminating the "pseudo" aspects.

The second issue is the direction of the Communist Party rule. There are two considerations as follows:

    1) Will Deng's death accelerate weakening of the party and lead to an eventual end of the single-party monopoly on power? Presumably, weakening will be inevitable, but the single-party system will not collapse that easily. It will undergo some changes but remain largely intact because of the absence of substitute governing machinery, and because the military will continue to support the party at least for the time being, and people of all classes and sectors still loathe or want to avoid disruption.

    2) Is there any prospect for restructuring and reconstruction of the party? For the immediate future, it will depend on how successful the party's efforts at internal democratization and economic management are. More specifically, successful conquest of corruption, recovery of integrity and improvement of ability to develop economic policies by the party and government will be essential. Systematization of politics, establishment of a legal framework and democratization will surface as important long-term challenges.

Thirdly, In addition to the first and second issues, the following four points are important for political and social stability or instability:

    1) Deterioration of public peace and order and mounting social discontent caused by aggravating graft and corruption: The seriousness of these problems has been recognized for some time as represented by the establishment of the Office of the Commissioner of General Social Order Administrationin early 1990. Solution of graft and corruption has become an extremely important issue.

    2) Mounting discontent with the authorities accompanied by the growing income gap and burden disparities: Despite growing disparities, the central government has chosen to follow the direction of reducing subsidies to local governments. This in turn will presumably expand disparities. The problem of disproportionate burdens comes to the fore in the explosion of discontent among peasants. Wan Li reportedly stated at a National People's Congress in the spring of 1993, "Nobody will be able to govern this country if peasants really rise in riot. Nothing is wanting for us peasants [to rise in riot]. Only Chen Sheng and Wu Guang are wanting."

    3) The "economic freedom and tight political control" line will have begun to show its limitations, and political control will be more or less eased: Opaque politics, non-separation of governments and enterprises, non-separation of the party and governments, and failure to establish an adequate system of appointing high-ranking officials are the roots of problems such as rampant graft/corruption and mounting social unrest/discontent brought about by economic reforms. Accordingly, there's no way but launching a political reform.

    4) Increasing tension and conflicts between Beijing and the provinces: Defeat of gubernatorial candidates recommended by the party's committee in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces in early 1993 demonstrates provincial performance. As the central government strengthen its tendencies to let local governments procure funds for fiscal/economic construction on their own, the latter will become more and more independent from the former. At the same time, powerful and appropriate central leadership will be called for by the increasing importance of national issues such as natural resources, energy, large-scale infrastructure and environment. The separate taxation system introduced in 1994 represents an attempt at formulating an institutional framework for fiscal affairs between the central and local governments. It remains to be seen how effectively this system will work.

3. Medium-term prospects -- outlook at the beginning of the 21st centur.

Development of medium-term prospects is a process involving numerous uncertainties, and does not go far beyond the confines of forecasts. However, at least the following statements can be made as material facts at the time which are presently identifiable:.

  1. A full-fledged take-over of leadership by new generations will progress, generating a fundamental qualitative change. One decisive point in this respect would be how far the still-opaque leaders in their forties will emerge, rather than those in their fifties about whom we have a fairly good idea at present. New leaders will show almost no adherence to Marxism-Leninism, but will likely remain strongly elitist. How they perceive the relation between nationalism and internationalism (focus on mutual dependency and international universalism) is important as a basic stance of political leadership.

  2. "One country, two systems" will be advanced in concrete terms after Hong Kong reverts to China. The question of integration and government system will move to a new phase linked closely with changes in economic and political leadership and international relationship. Chinese "Hong Kong" has immense political and social implications. Normalization of bilateral relations with Taiwan, which is highly strained politically despite major developments in economic ties, and realignment of the central and local governments will undoubtedly affect the "state" of Chinese government regime greatly.

  3. The reformist open-door line will move to a new phase and mutual economic and political dependency with the international community will deepen. However, it is completely uncertain whether China will move toward the direction of creating a unified national market, or toward linking markets similar to regional economic zones directly with an international economic system (development in the form of today's Greater China economic zone). Furthermore, whether China's mutually dependent relationship with the international community will be harmonious and cooperative, or awkward and at times hostile, will depend on its future political regime and economic changes including the external economy.

Finally, a few comments may be warranted as conclusions on medium-term prospects. If a major war larger in scale than the Sino-Vietnam war in 1979 and nationwide domestic political disruption can be avoided, overall performance of China in the 21st century will certainly exceed that of the present time regardless of mounting social contradictions such as expanding disparities, population explosion and weakening government. Its implications to the international community will depend on how the latter will perceive China with these contradictions, what relationship it will aspire to build with China, how seriously and patiently it will work to build such a relationship, and how China will react to the international community.

Subsequent papers will address these issues from respective perspectives.


References

  • Satoshi Amako: China -- "Socialist Super Power in Transition," Tokyo University Press, 1992, Introductio.

  • Paper by Wang Tie in "Sociological Study," 3rd issue 199.

  • Satoshi Amako: "Central and Local Governments in China -- a Frame of Reference of Changes in Socialist Political Regime. In Modern Asia Course 3 -- Democratization and Economic Progress," p. 77 ff. Edited by Noriyuki Hagiwara, Tokyo University Press, 199.

  • Hiroshi Nakajima: "Present Conditions of Guangdong Economy -- Interview with Ye Xuanping, Governor of Guangdong Province." In "Bulletin of Japan-China Association of Economy and Trade," May 1991, pp. 4-5.

  • Satoshi Amako: "Composition of Independence and Integration in China -- Shift to Cascade-type Authoritarian Regime." In "Political Changes in Greater China," edited by Tatsumi Okabe, Keiso Shobo. 1995, Chapter 1.


    Remarks:

    China in Transition and its Outlook for the Future" by Satoshi Amako, Professor of Aoyama Gakuin University and the Chairman of the Committee for the "Study of Chinese Direction and Japanese Strategy," was inserted to introduce reports of the committee which met 18 times since 1994. This paper represents the introduction and overview of the reports.